Dear JCPS

Protect Our Children

  • About Us

Set Up for Failure in 2008

The past two @JCPSKY superintendents had been grooming @ShawneeAcademy to be charter school’s sacrificial lamb — or so it seems. For a decade, the student assignment mix at the low performing high school has been significantly disproportionate to the rest of the district, and the resources to address the saturation level of needs have been insufficient, yet the school is still held to the same standards as an all-magnet school that requires application and acceptance. The school’s inability to compete in a rigged horse race, have been compounded by state laws that caused Shawnee to lose their SBDM power, forced shakeups, teacher and staff turnover, top down bullying of teachers and administrators who tried to protect vulnerable students from abusive testing and policies, and worse. “There is no way this would have been allowed to happen had this been a school in the East End,” said one Shawnee parent whose daughter chose to transfer from Atherton to Shawnee in 2015.

In his short time at the helm, Dr. Pollio has shown a great interest in addressing root cause issues in order to authentically turn Shawnee around and give it — and its students — the fighting chance it deserves. But he needs time. Folks like Hal Heiner and Jerry Stephens have had plenty of time to work on their plans. Bevin and the KDE Board need to give our new sup the same opportunity.

It’s becoming increasingly clear to myself and others that the “failure” of this beautiful school, housed on the largest public campus in the state, in a stately historical property built in 1927, was premeditated a decade ago to achieve their end goal: Charters in the West End. And voters and taxpayers “meddling” by taking back our school board and our administration is interfering with that goal.

Berman said it himself: “District officials have discussed … closing Shawnee. But it’s just an idea and probably a decade away.” That was 2008.

 

front-pagepage-2

From the article:

Now, the district is proposing new attendance zones for 16 high schools and 20 middle schools. Its aim is to leave no school with more than half its students from low-income, low-education and high-minority neighborhoods. Except for Shawnee High School. Under the proposal, Shawnee would still draw 87 percent of its students from low-income, low-education and high-minority areas — more than double the rate of any other high school. District officials could have created a satellite attendance zone for Shawnee in a more affluent area of Jefferson County to diversify enrollment. But they chose not to.

boundary-map

One quote in the article from Superintendent Berman indicates there could be a plan to shut the school down in 2018.

eviesupreme-courtincomesdecadecheri

 

 

 “District officials have discussed … closing Shawnee. But it’s just an idea and probably a decade away.” That was 2008.
  • WHISTLEBLOWERS:
    If you would like to confidentially report examples of student abuse or you experienced retaliation for reporting these types of incidents to your employer and/or appropriate agencies, please email us at moderator@dearjcps.com. Use subject #MakeItStop!


  • Blog

    • How Charter Schools Almost Infiltrated JCPS
    • BRIAN THURMAN: Unarmed Driver Shot and Killed by LMPD
    • “Duty of Obedience” in JCPS Organizations’ Bylaws Promotes “Pattern or Practice” of Discrimination
    • 15th District PTA is Mired in Controversy
    • Aren’t You Tired of It?
    • At Manual, “When We See Something, We Say Something” Rings Hollow
    • A Letter to Dr. Hargens
    • A Principal’s POV on Pension Reform
    • A Student’s Thoughts On Busing
    • A Thermometer Never Made Anyone Well
    • A Year Later, More Retribution

  • You can teach a child anything if you believe in them.

    Marva Collins

  • This site is run by local taxpayers, voters, stakeholders and volunteers of Dear JCPS. It is not affiliated with Jefferson County Public Schools.


  • DISCLAIMERS

    • Portions of this website are maintained as archived records and are presented in their original form. These pages are preserved for historical, educational, and informational purposes and are not currently being edited, updated, or revised.
    • The content on this website does not constitute political advocacy, electioneering, lobbying, or support for or opposition to any political party, political candidate, or ballot initiative. This LLC does not engage in partisan political activity.
    • Any references to public institutions, governmental bodies, laws, policies, or public officials are contextual and non-partisan and are included solely to document events, processes, or publicly available information as it existed at the time of publication.
    • Because laws, policies, and circumstances change, archived content may not reflect current conditions. Readers should consult current and authoritative sources for the most up-to-date information.
Proudly powered by LBI Buzz Theme: Blackboard by LBI Buzz.